An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
Blog Article
[three] For example, in England, the High Court as well as Court of Appeals are Every single bound by their possess previous decisions, however, For the reason that Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court of your United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, Even though in practice it hardly ever does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent would be the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom ruled that it and the other courts of England and Wales experienced misapplied the regulation for nearly 30 years.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees use.
10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair for the offender along with the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
As a result, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner should go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this kind of an appeal hasn't nonetheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then seek further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it's generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-examine witnesses and present his/her defense but did not convince the department of his/her innocence.
Many judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name to the ECL based around the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed Read more
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf from the boy by a guardian advert litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf in the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for a dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all acting in their Positions with DCFS.
The legislation of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case law in the particular court. Indeed, each circuit has its possess list of binding case legislation. As a result, a judgment rendered while in the Ninth Circuit will not be binding in the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to become gathered because of the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is well recognized now that the provision for proforma promotion isn't alien or unfamiliar into the civil servant service construction but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it really is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if glad that a civil servant who was entitled to generally be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his personal, wrongfully prevented from rendering service for the Federation/ province during the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay and allowances of these higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a very well-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on get more info some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.